Progress Evaluation for the Restaurant Industry Assessed by a Voluntary Marketing-Mix and Choice-Architecture Framework That Offers Strategies to Nudge American Customers toward Healthy Food Environments, 2006-2017

Equity Focus

This study targets to evaluate the progress of restaurants' strategies to promote healthy options in the United States.

Case Summary

The project conducted a desk review of seven electronic databases (January 2006–January 2017) to examine restaurant strategies used to promote healthful options in the United States (U.S.). Evidence selection (n= 84) was guided by the LEAD principles (i.e., locate, evaluate, and assemble evidence to inform decisions) and verified by data and investigator triangulation. A marketing-mix and choice-architecture framework was used to examine eight voluntary strategies (i.e., place, profile, portion, pricing, promotion, healthy default picks, priming or prompting and proximity) to evaluate progress (i.e., no, limited, some or extensive) toward 12 performance metrics based on available published evidence. The U.S. restaurant sector has made limited progress to use pricing, profile (reformulation), healthy default picks (choices), promotion (responsible marketing) and priming and prompting (information and labeling); and some progress to reduce portions.

Lessons Learned

  • This project tested a novel marketing-mix and choice-architecture framework to evaluate the nature and extent of voluntary strategies used by U.S. chain and non-chain restaurants to promote healthy food environments for customers. This framework could serve as a useful planning tool for restaurant owners and managers, as well as an evaluation approach for other public- and private-sector stakeholders in the U.S. and other countries to monitor and evaluate progress of the restaurant sector to meet healthy targets.

LINK TO CASE STUDY Arrow right

Search results for Framework: Monitor: 11

CASE STUDY
2020

Implementation of healthy food environment policies to prevent nutrition-related non-communicable diseases in Ghana: National experts' assessment of government action

Flag Ghana
GHANA
CASE STUDY
2019

Policies to Create Healthier Food Environments in Canada: Experts' Evaluation and Prioritized Actions Using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI)

Flag Canada
CANADA
CASE STUDY
2019

An 11-country study to benchmark the implementation of recommended nutrition policies by national governments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index, 2015-2018

Flag Global
GLOBAL
CASE STUDY
2019

The INFORMAS healthy food environment policy index (Food-EPI) in Mexico: An assessment of implementation gaps and priority recommendations

Flag Mexico
MEXICO
CASE STUDY
2018

Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations

Flag Malaysia
MALAYSIA
CASE STUDY
2018

Measuring and stimulating progress on implementing widely recommended food environment policies: the New Zealand case study

Flag New Zealand
NEW ZEALAND
CASE STUDY
2018

Changing the restaurant food environment to improve cardiovascular health in a rural community: implementation and evaluation of the Heart of New Ulm restaurant programme

Flag United States
UNITED STATES
CASE STUDY
2017

Exploring sales data during a healthy corner store intervention in Toronto: the Food Retail Environments Shaping Health (FRESH) project

Flag Canada
CANADA
CASE STUDY
2017

Level of implementation of best practice policies for creating healthy food environments: assessment by state and non-state actors in Thailand

Flag Thailand
THAILAND
CASE STUDY
2017

Progress Evaluation for the Restaurant Industry Assessed by a Voluntary Marketing-Mix and Choice-Architecture Framework That Offers Strategies to Nudge American Customers toward Healthy Food Environments, 2006-2017

Flag United States
UNITED STATES
CASE STUDY
2015

The healthy food environment policy index: findings of an expert panel in New Zealand

Flag New Zealand
NEW ZEALAND